<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Westway Terminals Archives | Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/tag/westway-terminals/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/tag/westway-terminals/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastbuilddate>Tue, 24 May 2016 13:30:25 +0000</lastbuilddate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updateperiod>
	hourly	</sy:updateperiod>
	<sy:updatefrequency>
	1	</sy:updatefrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.6.2</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Grays Harbor Should Beware Westway’s Oil Terminal Ambitions</title>
		<link>https://www.sightline.org/2016/05/24/grays-harbor-should-beware-westways-oil-terminal-ambitions/</link>
					<comments>https://www.sightline.org/2016/05/24/grays-harbor-should-beware-westways-oil-terminal-ambitions/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SwatchJunkies]]></dc:creator>
		<pubdate>Tue, 24 May 2016 13:30:25 +0000</pubdate>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate + Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy + Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossil Fuel Transition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossil Fuel Exports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grays Harbor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hoquiam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Westway Terminals]]></category>
		<guid ispermalink="false">http://www.sightline.org/?p=53690</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A little-known company called Westway has big aspirations in the Pacific Northwest. If the firm gets its way, it will build and operate an oil terminal on the shores of Grays Harbor, Washington, that will bring in large quantities of crude oil by rail, store it in tanks on the shoreline, and ship it out ... <a title="Grays Harbor Should Beware Westway’s Oil Terminal Ambitions" class="read-more" href="https://www.sightline.org/2016/05/24/grays-harbor-should-beware-westways-oil-terminal-ambitions/" aria-label="Read more about Grays Harbor Should Beware Westway’s Oil Terminal Ambitions">Read more</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.sightline.org/2016/05/24/grays-harbor-should-beware-westways-oil-terminal-ambitions/">Grays Harbor Should Beware Westway’s Oil Terminal Ambitions</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.sightline.org">Sightline Institute</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentrss>https://www.sightline.org/2016/05/24/grays-harbor-should-beware-westways-oil-terminal-ambitions/feed/</wfw:commentrss>
			<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>1 Million Barrels a Day, 100 Trains a Week</title>
		<link>https://www.sightline.org/2015/07/06/1-million-barrels-a-day-100-trains-a-week/</link>
					<comments>https://www.sightline.org/2015/07/06/1-million-barrels-a-day-100-trains-a-week/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SwatchJunkies]]></dc:creator>
		<pubdate>Mon, 06 Jul 2015 12:45:38 +0000</pubdate>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate + Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossil Fuel Transition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anacortes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossil Fuel Exports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grays Harbor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hoquiam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Longview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Portland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tacoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tesoro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vancouver WA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Westway Terminals]]></category>
		<guid ispermalink="false">http://www.sightline.org/?p=44476</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Sightline is re-releasing a popular report: <a href="http://www.sightline.org/research/the-northwests-pipeline-on-rails/">The Northwest’s Pipeline on Rails</a>. It’s the most comprehensive regional analysis of plans to ship crude oil by train. This update includes important new information showing far greater increases in oil train transport than previously thought. All told, the Northwest could soon be seeing more than one million barrels of crude oil by rail per day---far more than the Keystone XL Pipeline would move.</p>
<p>Moving large quantities of oil by rail would represent a major change for the Northwest’s energy economy, and the plans now in development put the region’s communities at risk.</p>
<p>Why does it matter?</p>
<ul>
<li>In British Columbia, Oregon, and Washington, 15 refineries and port terminals are planning, building, or already operating oil-by-rail shipments.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>If all of the projects were built and operated at full capacity, they would require more than 100 loaded mile-long trains per week<br />
<p>The post <a href="https://www.sightline.org/2015/07/06/1-million-barrels-a-day-100-trains-a-week/">1 Million Barrels a Day, 100 Trains a Week</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.sightline.org">Sightline Institute</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentrss>https://www.sightline.org/2015/07/06/1-million-barrels-a-day-100-trains-a-week/feed/</wfw:commentrss>
			<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>