fbpx
Donate Newsletters

South Korea to Boost Its Coal Tax

South Korean flag
South Korean flag Image by Nudimmud used under CC BY-SA 3.0

If you follow Northwest coal export issues, you’ve probably heard that China’s demand for coal is sinking fast. Overall coal consumption in China fell a whopping 8 percent the first four months of 2015—an astonishing decline for an economy that’s growing as quickly as China’s. But imports really took it on the chin, with China’s customs department reporting that the country’s ports handled 38 percent less coal from January through May than in the same months of the prior year. China’s import decline has kept Pacific Rim coal prices in the doldrums, and completely deflated market expectations for ready profits from the international coal trade.

But what’s less well known is that China isn’t the only country that’s posing a challenge to coal exports. South Korea, which is the destination for much of the US coal shipped across the Pacific, is seeing many of the same trends.

According to the IHS McCloskey Coal Report, demand from Korean coal-fired power plants was slacker than expected over the winter and spring months. Even more troubling for would-be coal exporters, South Korean power companies recently axed plans for four new coal plants, and delayed several more. Industry analysts suspect that additional delays may be in the offing. Meanwhile, the country recently unveiled an energy plan that would reduce coal’s share in the nation’s energy mix from 37 percent, where it is today, down to 27 percent by 2029.

Read more

Sightline Sues Obama Administration over Crude Oil Exports and Illegal Secrecy

Oil tanker Alaskan Frontier anchored near Port Angeles, WA, in June, 2008

If the oil industry gets its way, the US will soon begin exporting tankers full of American crude to overseas markets. Although such shipments are for the most part illegal today, the Obama Administration is quietly changing the rules to favor oil exporters.

To shed some light on the government’s behavior, the environmental law firm Earthjustice filed a formal Freedom of Information Act request in February on Sightline’s behalf, but it was greeted only by stony silence. So today, Sightline Institute, represented again by Earthjustice, is suing the federal government. We are asking the Courts to force the Obama Administration to do what it was legally required to by March 11: release information about its secretive deals with oil exporters to the public.

The federal government’s behavior is worrisome not only because of its plain disregard for public disclosure laws, but also because it violates longstanding laws that govern the oil industry. In fact, for nearly four decades, the US government has tightly restricted exports of domestic crude oil. The oil export “ban,” as it is commonly known, has been a prominent feature of the national energy landscape since the 1975 Energy Policy and Conservation Act—but the oil industry has it squarely in its crosshairs.

Read more

Event: Oil Trains in Spokane, WA, and Sandpoint, ID

Editor’s Note 8/5/2015: Want to watch Eric de Place keynote the Spokane coal export and oil train event listed below? Watch the entirety of the forum here! Enjoy the video, and share it with a friend unfamiliar with the topic.

Next week, I’ll be keynoting a pair community events in the Inland Northwest on oil trains and coal exports—a region facing an especially severe onslaught of rail traffic. Tuesday evening, I’ll join The Lands Council and other partners at Gonzaga University in Spokane, Washington. Wednesday night, I’ll be with the Idaho Conservation League and Lake Pend Oreille Waterkeeper at the Heartwood Center in Sandpoint, Idaho. Both events are free and open to the public, so if you live in the area, I hope you’ll join us and even bring along friends or family unfamiliar with the topic.

Read more

An Explainer: Coal Mine Cleanup and “Self-Bonds”

In case you missed the news, coal industry stock prices took yet another tumble on Friday, with all four of the largest US coal companies—Arch Coal, Alpha Natural Resources, Cloud Peak Energy, and Peabody Energy—closing at all-time lows. A Bloomberg analysis attributed the fall to new concerns about the financing of coal mine cleanups:

Two U.S. coal companies, Peabody Energy Corp. and Arch Coal Inc., sank to all-time lows amid concerns that they will have to pay more for insurance that covers environmental damage.

This, I’m sure, is the first time that many folks had ever read anything about coal mine cleanup, especially in the business press. So for newbies who just want an overview of the issue, have I got a treat for you: an FAQ covering the basics of the coal mine reclamation liabilities!!! (Please try to contain your excitement.)

Here goes…

Read more

Sightline on Shell’s Presence in Seattle

For those following the increasingly hot controversy over the Port of Seattle hosting Shell’s Arctic drilling rig, I recommend this 45-minute interview I did recently on KBOO, a community radio station based in Portland. Together with Peter Goldman of the Washington Forest Law Center and host Barbara Bernstein, I explored some of the dimensions of … Read more

Ridley’s Coal Exports: A Terminal Illness?

The Ridley coal export terminal in Northern BC, which has been suffering through a dismal year of collapsing exports in the face of weak international prices, recently published its 2014 annual report on its website.

And it’s a doozy.

Annual reports usually are written with a hint of sunny can-do optimism. They trumpet every shred of good news, present even the direst challenges as golden opportunities, and paint a vision of a bright and profitable corporate future.

But Ridley’s 2014 annual report is written differently. There’s no sunny optimism, just a litany of woes. You can’t read it without thinking that the authors are as depressed as the coal markets that are dragging down their business.

The sense of doom starts from the top.

Read more

Feds to Investigate Coal Mine Cleanup Program

Big Coal’s finances are in shambles. Stock prices have tanked. Wall Street has downgraded major coal company debt to junk status. And with both domestic and international coal sales slumping, the specter of a wave of major coal industry bankruptcies looms ever nearer.

Still, state regulators have allowed the nation’s two largest coal companies by sales volume, Peabody Energy and Arch Coal, to continue qualifying for a preferential mine cleanup insurance program that’s reserved for the most financially healthy institutions.

The program is known as “self-bonding.” And as a bombshell of a Reuters investigation shows, it’s now under intense scrutiny by US mine regulators.

Here’s how self-bonding works—and how it’s become such an egregious loophole.

Under federal surface mining law, US coal companies must post bonds to guarantee that they’ll have the financial wherewithal to clean up or “reclaim” their mines. For the most part, these reclamation bonds are backed up by cash, collateral, or financial guarantees known as sureties. Even if a coal company goes belly up, the state can use those bonds to restore land ravaged by mining.

Bonding can be costly to coal companies, because it either ties up collateral that they’d rather use for some other purpose, or it forces them to purchase private surety bonds that can cost them tens of millions of dollars per year.

Read more

Low Oil Prices = Less Oil Drilling

A few years back, when most oil industry analysts thought that oil prices would remain in the $100-per-barrel range for the foreseeable future, domestic oil companies found that they could earn a healthy profit by fracking “tight oil” out of shale rock formations. Drilling activity in North Dakota, home of the oil-rich Bakken Shale, shot through the roof, catapulting the Flickertail State (yes, that’s an actual nickname for North Dakota) into the #2 oil-producing state in the country, second only to Texas.

But starting in the summer of 2014, global oil prices began to collapse. Within a few months, US prices had fallen below $50 per barrel, and oil drilling activity in North Dakota collapsed. Take a look at the oil drilling trend for North Dakota, derived from the Baker Hughes North American rotary rig count.

North Dakota oil drilling collapsed after oil prices fell.
North Dakota oil drilling collapsed after oil prices fell. North America Rotary Rig County data by Baker Hughes

It’s perhaps a little early to see the drilling collapse in the state’s oil production statistics. But some Wall Street analysts have certainly noticed the drilling trend and are starting to speculate that the collapse in shale oil drilling could lead to a new round of oil price volatility.

Read more

Event: Coastal Washington, the Oil Industry’s Sacrifice Zone

Washington State is on the front lines of oil transport by rail. The ten oil train explosions in the last two years and the numerous oil spills on Washington’s coast are reminders that there are devastating consequences when it comes to transporting oil. Ten new proposals have emerged in just the last year to ship crude oil by train to Northwest refineries and port terminals.

On June 10th, I’ll be in Hoquiam with several area leaders for a free, public forum on the alarming growth in oil train traffic through Grays Harbor County and the costs and consequences of the oil-by-rail industry for local residents. I’ll introduce the topic and moderate a panel of local leaders including Larry Thevik, Vice President of the Washington Dungeness Crab Fishermen’s Association; David Batker, of Earth Economics; Tammy Domike, of Citizens for a Clean Harbor; Crystal Dingler, Mayor of Ocean Shores; and Fawn Sharp, President of the Quinault Indian Nation.

  • What: Discussion on the risks of oil transportation in Coastal Washington
  • When: Wednesday, June 10, 6:30-8:00 PM
  • Where: Hoquiam High School Theater, 501 W Emerson Ave (map)
  • Tickets: The event is free and open to the public, but space is limited. Please RSVP.

Questions? Contact Tammy Domike (email) of Citizens for a Clean Harbor.

Read more

How Shell Manipulates Washington State Politics

Yesterday afternoon, Shell Oil’s titanic drilling rig made its way into the Port of Seattle, where it will undergo repairs before heading north to drill in the Chukchi Sea off Alaska’s north coast this summer. After local company Foss Maritime inked a secretive lease with the Port to repair two of Shell’s skyscraper-sized oil drilling rigs, the region has been embroiled in a raging controversy over the wisdom of allowing the second largest company in the world to use Seattle as a staging ground for Arctic oil drilling. Shell’s last run at Arctic oil, when the company’s flagship Kulluk drilling rig ran aground near Alaska’s Kodiak Island, was a signal failure, but Shell plans to return to the precarious Arctic seas this summer for another try at tapping the oil reserves.

And in Skagit County, Shell has plans to build a large oil train facility at its Anacortes Refinery. After the county hearing examiner recently determined that the company should conduct a full environmental review of the project, Shell sued the county. The case will be heard this month.

Shell’s schemes have the region in an uproar, so now is a good time to explore the oil company’s well documented record of interfering in Washington’s politics.

Read more