Series: BP, Tim Eyman, and I-1053
![CA Supreme Court by Shawn used under CC BY-NC 2.0 (https://www.flickr.com/photos/shawncalhoun/8449081876/in/photolist-dSBKFs-p4v9Bb-8R9oNZ-7UnrLH-2W2MPg-4g3Hxy-pYtqbd-p2y2wC-pFX2dw-p2y2vq-pYaE9t-pFUPhn-pYkuGX-pFX24y-p2y2mY-p2AVRx-p2AVNr-pFUP9M-pYkuBg-pG19ko-pFUP6F-p2AVHM-p2AVGe-pYkuwM-pWeY8o-pFYmaB-pYaDyR-p2y1PW-p2AV8t-pYktHn-pYtoYd-pFWZXL-pG18pL-pFWZU9-pYktCc-pFWZEm-pYktpM-pWeWTj-pYaCAP-p2xZMf-pYktki-pFYjTt-pG17Y5-pYktgF-p2AUgt-pG17S3-pYktcn-pYktaP-pFWZiQ-pG17LG) Supreme Court, by Shawn, cc.](https://www.sightline.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Supreme-Court-by-Shawn-cc.-275x183.jpg)
CA Supreme Court by Shawn used under CC BY-NC 2.0
A look at the 2010 Washington state initiative 1053, a Tim Eyman proposal that sought to institute minority rule over revenue measures. The series explores the ways in which I-1053 was not only undemocratic and unconstitutional, but downright unfair.