fbpx
Donate Newsletters
Home » Democracy + Elections » The Voting System Democrats and Republicans Are Afraid Of

The Voting System Democrats and Republicans Are Afraid Of

SwatchJunkies

It took a lot of effort, but voters worked towards electoral reform and have remedied the problem of minority winners.
Tweet This

Maine Governor Paul LePage called ranked voting “the most horrific thing in the world” and said he would not certify Maine’s primary election, which used ranked ballots. In a world that includes genocide and poverty, not to mention deep fried twinkies, what could make LePage call ranked choice voting “the most horrific thing”? Well, ranked choice voting would have forced LePage to win a majority before he could become governor. LePage was elected with less than 40 percent of the vote in 2010, and with less than 50 percent in 2014.  

Oh, that.  

Maine voters have been very clear: they want ranked-choice voting. In 2016, Mainers said YES to Ballot Question 5, to use ranked choice voting for state and federal elections. The powers that be (legislators and the governor) had a hissy fit, pulling out all the stops to halt  voting reform. This week, Mainers again said yes to ranked choice voting. A new ballot measure asking Mainers if they are really, really sure about this whole ranked choice voting thing, passed. Ranked choice voting is in Maine to stay.  

The same ballot that asked voters to re-affirm their commitment to ranked voting also gave them their first opportunity to use a ranked ballot in a statewide race. The primary elections used ranked ballots (see Maine’s sample ballot below), and one race in particular showed how important ranked ballots are in a crowded race. Seven people ran to be the Democratic candidate for governor, splitting the vote so badly that no candidate won even as much as one-third of it. Without ranked ballots, a candidate would have won the Democratic nomination even though nearly two-thirds of Democratic voters preferred someone else. But voters got to indicate their second choices, so Maine will be able to automatically simulate a runoff election, without asking voters to fill out a new ballot. The candidates with the fewest votes will be eliminated and voters will, in effect, vote in a special runoff with a narrowed field until one candidate emerges with a majority.  

Maine had a particular call to action: unpopular candidates like LePage winning the governorship even though most voters didn’t want them. Reformers started small, introducing ranked choice voting in the city of Portland, Maine, first before taking the campaign statewide. It took a lot of effort, but voters worked towards electoral reform and have remedied that problem of minority winners.  

The Pacific Northwest has a slightly different call to action: votes going to wasteunfair elections results where votes don’t match legislative seats, and under-representation of women and people of color 

But British Columbia might already be ready to take electoral reform to the provincial level, and in Oregon and Washington reformers could start introducing reforms to cities, counties, and school boards. If we work towards reforms, we could remedy those problems and make more votes count by giving more voters a voice in government.   

Talk to the Author

SwatchJunkies

Talk to the Author

Kristin Eberhard

Kristin Eberhard is a fellow with Sightline Institute and Senior Director of State & Local Policy for Rewiring America, following work as Director of Climate Policy at the Niskanen Center.

About Sightline

Sightline Institute is an independent, nonpartisan, nonprofit think tank providing leading original analysis of democracy, forests, energy, and housing policy in the Pacific Northwest, Alaska, British Columbia, and beyond.

Comments are closed.

For press inquiries and interview requests, please contact Martina Pansze.

Sightline Institute is a 501(c)3 non-profit organization and does not support, endorse, or oppose any candidate or political party.

You can power us forward on sustainable solutions.

See an error? Have a question?

Find the author's contact information on our staff page to reach out to them, or send a message to editor@sightline.org.