This news from the Spokane Spokesman-Review caught my eye:
Tons of slash from a 250-acre logging site north of Loon Lake, Wash., could have gone up in smoke.
Instead, the woody debris will be chipped and hauled to Avista Corp’s biomass facility in Kettle Falls, where it will produce enough electricity to meet 37,500 homes’ needs for about eight hours.
I’m the very first to admit that I know very little about forest management. No, strike that—I effectively know nothing. So I have no idea if carting away all of that debris could deprive the soil of necessary nutrients over the long haul—or if burning slash is even a reasonable forest management technique. (Can anyone out there in blog-land help me out?)
Still, from a novice’s point of view, this doesn’t seem crazy: if the “waste” wood is going to be burned anyway, why not try to use the heat to generate some electricity?
Well, that’s fine as far as it goes. But what caught my eye was the numbers: 250 acres, for 8 hours of power, for 37,500 homes. Could that possibly scale up? Could wood waste offset a significant amount of fossil fuels in the generation mix?
Short answer: probably not.
Just running the numbers a bit—and remember, these are order-of magnitude estimates, so use them at your own risk…
- First off, let’s assume that the slash in those 250 acres is fairly representative of yield across the state. That’s a huge assumption, obviously, and it’s probably wrong. But we’re just playing around, right?
- To power 37,500 homes for a full year, rather than just 8 hours, would require the slash from 3 x 365 x 250 acres = 273,750 acres of land. (In comparison, Mt. Rainier National Park is about 236,000 acres.)
- Excluding wilderness, parks, and other protected areas, there are about 18 million acres of forest land in the state of Washington. (See here for more precise estimates.)
- Assuming 50 year rotations, that makes about 360,000 acres of logged forest per year. (Remember, I’m a forestry newbie, so I have no idea if 50 years is a reasonable estimate for the average rotation length of the average forest in the state.)
- If we used all of the slash from those 360,000 acres to generate electricity, it would power about 50,000 homes for a year, give or take.
- The census says that there are about 2.6 million housing units in Washington State—meaning that if the forest slash from all logged land in the state were burned for electricity, it could provide about 2 percent of the state’s residential power needs. Note that this doesn’t include the use of electricity in office buildings, factories, and smelters—all of which are substantial.
So it looks like forest slash is small beans. That’s not an argument that burning slash for power is a bad idea; I have no opinion on the matter, really. But it does suggest that it’s a bit unrealistic to hope that slash will play more than a bit part in our energy future. Still, it’s a worthwhile experiment; as long as forest soils don’t suffer, every little bit of non-fossil energy can help.
Photo courtesy of Flickr user Joseph Robinson under a Creative Commons license.
Yule Heibel
I probably know less about it than you do, but I remember reading a year or more ago about a Canadian company that developed a mobile unit, designed to travel to logging sites. There it did whatever it does to slash to turn it into fuel. The latter in turn could be used by the trucks hauling the logs away. That seemed a better way to “close the loops” (in a learning from nature sort of way)—better than taking the slash away to a plant for processing, because you don’t waste fuel transporting the slash (although you have to use fuel to move the mobile processor), and you use the fuel produced by the mobile unit to run the trucks that would otherwise need fuel, …which would also have to be trucked in. Sorry I can’t recall the name of the company—I believe they were in negotiation with an American outfit, basically to pool their technologies.
Chad Davis
I work for Sustainable Northwest, a non-profit based in Portland, OR; our work focuses on helping people and communities restore and maintain ecological health, balance diverse interests, and promote economic opportunities. One sector of that is working with woody biomass utilization as a renewable energy feedstock.First, here’s some brief background on electricity generation from wood for those wondering:Power generation comes in two forms in respect to woody biomass: 1) stand-alone power facilities, and 2) CHP—combined heat and power—where a heat use(r) is co-located with the power generating facility (ie. using heat/steam to dry green lumber). CHP facilities fair better economically because of capturing the by-product of thermal energy (heat). Rates for electricity in the Pacific Northwest will continue to be dominated by hydro in the Pacific Northwest. BPA produces really cheap (and really clean relative to GHG emissions alone) on the Columbia River. Woody biomass power also has problems competing against other renewables due to several reasons; one being the Federal Production Tax Credit. This legislation is meant to spur renewable power generation gives a tax credit equal to $0.019 per kWh for wind, solar and geothermal, but only a credit of $0.009 per kWh for that derived from woody biomass.For general info, here’s a primer on woody biomass generated by the Rural Voices for Conservation Coalition (RVCC).And now specifically relating to forest slash and woody biomass:No woody biomass power facility in the Pacific Northwest currently uses forest slash as its sole-source of feedstock. Often, this source is a relatively low percentage of the mix because of the cost to harvest, gather, and transport it. Urban wood waste, wood chips (residuals) from wood products plants, and tree bark generated on-site (at a lumber mill or paper mill) often constitute a large percentage of the supply. The recent interest in using forest slash to generate power is also related to the need for forest restoration and fuel reduction treatments in fire-adapted forests (primarily east of the Cascades and throughout the inter-mountain West). Fire preclusion and past management strategies (along with global lumber markets and a host of other factors) have resulted in overstocked forests that are more susceptible to natural fires. We have experienced a recent upturn in the amount and intensity of stand-replacing wildfires, historically uncharacteristic in fire-adapted forests.The bigger picture:The potential of electricity generated from woody biomass from restoration treatments is not a huge source of energy when compared to current demand. Another way to look at this though is to forecast future demand, in terms of projected growth for the Pacific Northwest. Without knowing those exact estimates off-hand, woody biomass can be a feedstock for power generation for meeting future electric demand in the Pacific Northwest.This post got me excited to share some information, so I’ve written a mini-expose on the subject…including more math! I’ve posted it to our website here…
Clark Williams-Derry
Thanks for the education, Chad!!