fbpx
Donate Newsletters
Home » Climate + Energy » Another Columbia River Oil Trains Proposal

Another Columbia River Oil Trains Proposal

SwatchJunkies

Northwest communities have been knocking down oil train development proposals as fast as they can spring up. In the last two years alone the region’s opposition movement has, by various means, spiked projects all around western Washington: once in Vancouver, once in Anacortes, and three times in Hoquiam. One big proposal is still under review in Vancouver, but the odds of its approval are shrinking.

Stymied at every turn, there’s reason to believe the industry is now setting its sights on Port Westward, a small industrial park in rural northwest Oregon on the Columbia River. Those tracking the region’s fossil fuel export controversies may recall that Port Westward is the site of two failed coal export schemes, as well as an active proposal to build a huge petrochemical plant. It’s the same place where an energy company called Global Partners runs trains loaded with ethanol to a terminal for loading onto marine vessels.

Up until January 2016, Global Partners was moving crude oil by rail to the site—initially in gross violation of its state permits—but as oil prices tanked and markets shifted, the firm switched to ethanol. Now, the company is angling to substantially expand its holdings at Port Westward, and it looks very much like an attempt to become a big player in oil-by-rail. Global Partners is on the verge of striking a deal with Portland General Electric (a utility that owns a neighboring power plant) to acquire 1.2 million gallons of storage tank capacity, a pipeline connecting those tanks to the Port Westward dock, and permission to expand its on-site rail infrastructure.

The site is already badly polluted with serious oil contamination of the soil and groundwater. A 2012 peer-reviewed paper published in 2012 found that Chinook salmon nearby were contaminated enough by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, which are derived from petroleum products, to harm their immune systems and reproductive abilities.

If approved by state regulators, the transaction would position Global Partners as the Northwest’s dominant oil train operator. The site is already permitted to received up to 120,000 barrels per day by rail, far more than any of the Puget Sound refineries that are allowed to handle oil trains. It’s the equivalent of roughly 12 loaded trains per week, all of which would travel through the Columbia River Gorge—the site of a catastrophic oil train explosion in June 2016—as far as Portland before transferring to the notoriously under-insured railroad that reaches Port Westward. At Port Westward, site operators would transfer the oil to above-ground storage tanks before loading it onto oceangoing vessels that would ship it to West Coast refineries or, if prices rebound, to export markets abroad.

The Oregon Public Utility Commission is weighing approval of the project. It can deny approval of the sale if regulators deem it not in the public interest. The agency is holding a public hearing on the project in Salem the morning of June 13. The good folks at Columbia Riverkeeper have details about the hearing and more information about the project.

 

Thanks to Alyse Nelson for research assistance.

 

Talk to the Author

SwatchJunkies

Talk to the Author

Eric de Place

Eric de Place spearheaded Sightline’s work on energy policy for two decades.

About Sightline

Sightline Institute is an independent, nonpartisan, nonprofit think tank providing leading original analysis of democracy, forests, energy, and housing policy in the Pacific Northwest, Alaska, British Columbia, and beyond.

Comments are closed.

For press inquiries and interview requests, please contact Martina Pansze.

Sightline Institute is a 501(c)3 non-profit organization and does not support, endorse, or oppose any candidate or political party.

You can power us forward on sustainable solutions.

See an error? Have a question?

Find the author's contact information on our staff page to reach out to them, or send a message to editor@sightline.org.