China is aiming to construct and operate three methanol refineries in Oregon and Washington in a move that would turn the Northwest into the nation’s leading producer and exporter of methanol. The Chinese officials promoting the projects are working in partnership with senior US officials, including Washington Governor Jay Inslee.
A new company called Northwest Innovation Works—an offspring of the Chinese Academy of Sciences Holdings, which develops and markets new technologies—has hatched plans to develop three methanol production plants with storage facilities in the region. Many analysts predict that methanol use will increase dramatically in the coming years and industry backers argue that it presents an economic opportunity. Yet methanol is little understood by most of the public, and its production raises some risks and concerns.
In this article and a companion piece to follow, Sightline will explore some of the fundamentals about these new methanol facilities—and what they mean for the Northwest.
The nickel summary
If they are built, the Northwest refineries would receive US and Canadian natural gas transported by pipeline to newly-built facilities in Kalama and Tacoma, Washington and Clatskanie, Oregon where the natural gas would be converted to the chemical methanol, sometimes known as wood alcohol. The methanol would then be shipped to Asia, where it will be used primarily as a “feedstock”—the raw material—to create olefins, petrochemicals that are in turn used to make polymers for the manufacture of plastics.
The three plants planned for the Northwest would produce a combined 10.8 million metric tons annually (mmta), far more than the entire 3.5 mmta methanol stream that is currently produced by the seven operating methanol facilities nationwide, according to Dave McCaskill at Argus DeWitt. Construction could cost as much as $5.4 billion—around $1.8 billion per facility—and the project backers hope to begin initial operations in early 2019.
Kalama, Washington
Of these three proposed projects, the refinery at Kalama is the furthest along.
In April 2014, the Port of Kalama awarded a lease agreement for the refinery to Northwest Innovation Works along with a separate three-year lease agreement for the company to locate its corporate headquarters in Kalama. In a spring 2014 newsletter, the Port boasted about the project creating 1,000 construction jobs during the three year build-out of the site plus 200 ongoing jobs during operations, as well as reducing carbon emissions by producing methanol from natural gas, rather than from petroleum and coal. Once both phases of the plant are completed, the facility operators will aim to produce 3.6 mmta of methanol. The finished product will be stored in 200,000 metric ton storage tanks and then transferred by pipeline to a new deep-draft marine terminal on the Columbia River—a new concrete dock, plus dredging the river bottom to accommodate larger ships—that would see 3 to 6 vessel calls per month once the plant is operational.
“The Northwest could be the nation’s leading producer and exporter of #methanol.”
Like most major industrial projects, the facility plans will undergo a review process requiring state officials to prepare and assess an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), a process that provides several opportunities for public comment. The first phase of that process, the “scoping” document that outlines the parameters of the review, was issued in January 2015. Officials outlined key features of the project in a scoping meeting presentation. The second phase of the review process, publication of a draft EIS, is slated for mid-2015.
In addition, Northwest Innovation Works will have to secure an air permit, a water quality permit, and a stormwater discharge permit from the Washington Department of Ecology. Provided that the plans pass muster with regulators over the 18- to 24-month review period, the site would then be issued a 30-year lease on the Kalama property. The Port hopes to complete the permitting processes by early 2016, beginning construction of the first phase immediately thereafter. On its website, Northwest Innovation Works says that it hopes to complete a first phase in early 2018 and a second phase by early 2019.
The Kalama Refinery would be fed by a new 3.1-mile, 24-inch diameter natural gas pipeline that will divert natural gas from the existing Northwest Pipeline. As with other pipelines, the project must first clear several regulatory and permitting hurdles, the most significant of which is approval by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). The pipeline backers submitted initial paperwork to FERC in 2014, and were issued an Environmental Assessment report on July 13, 2015. Regulators opened up a 30-day public comment period extended until August 12th, during which time members of the public were able to provide formal feedback on the project’s potential impacts, alternatives to it, and measures to avoid or lessen any harms associated with it. If the pipeline and the methanol plant projects are both approved, construction of the pipeline would begin in 2017.
Tacoma, Washington
In Tacoma, Northwest Innovation Works has already obtained a 30-year lease agreement with the Port of Tacoma for a $1.8 billion, two-phase methanol plant very similar to the one in Kalama, and the project plans are now undergoing an EIS review process that may take up to two years. Although the Tacoma project is not as far along in its review process, Northwest Innovation Works hopes to adhere to the same schedule as at the Port of Kalama, with construction of phase one beginning in 2016 and ending in 2018, and a second phase completing in 2019.
As in the case of the Kalama project, natural gas would arrive at the Tacoma refinery via a newly constructed lateral pipeline, but the firm is still involved in discussions with gas suppliers to reach an agreement on building this new segment.
Clatskanie, Oregon
The third Northwest methanol facility is planned for Port Westward, a publicly owned industrial park near Clatskanie, Oregon. In February 2014, the Port of St. Helens and Northwest Innovation Works signed an Option to Lease agreement for the site. According to Paula Miranda at the Port, both Northwest Innovation Works and the Port will conduct due diligence exercises, which may eventually result in a lease agreement between the two parties. This project is the least developed of the three and does not yet have any permits secured.
Although the Port Westward project is not far along its path to establishment, Northwest Innovation Works recently published a FAQ-style document that hinted at an interest in even more methanol development than is already underway, perhaps with yet another site or expansions to the existing plans for Port Westward and Kalama.
What are the risks and benefits of methanol refining?
In its Port Westward FAQ, Northwest Innovation Works acknowledges that methanol production can have potentially negative effects. These plants produce waste that includes nickel, copper, and zinc oxide from the catalysts used in the refining process; air pollution that includes carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxide, sulfur dioxide, volatile organic compounds, and fine particulate matter; and roughly 200 gallons of wastewater per minute.
Methanol is flammable in liquid and gas states, and it is considered highly toxic to humans and animals. The company argues, however, that according to a 2011 study from Duke University, “methanol poses little long-term threat to ecosystems because it is biodegraded quickly in both aerobic and anaerobic conditions and therefore is unlikely to accumulate in the environment.”
“Methanol is flammable in liquid and gas states, and it is considered highly toxic to humans and animals.”
Each of these facilities would use more than 2,500 gallons of water per minute for cooling and gas forming, 90 percent of which is consumed during the process or lost as vapor to the atmosphere. The Port Westward plant alone would draw as much as 2,750 gallons per minute from the Columbia River. To run the refinery, the plant operators also need 200 megawatts of electricity per day, and they will combust 30 percent of the natural gas—about 96 million cubic feet per day— that enters the facility for use in chemical reactions.
The project backers argue that Northwest methanol production is good for the environment. They reason that exporting US methanol made from natural gas will reduce China’s overall dependence on coal and petroleum, the primary inputs currently used to produce methanol in China. In fact, Northwest Innovation Works claims that methanol from natural gas rather than coal reduces carbon emissions by 70 percent.
What is the political landscape for these projects?
On June 24, 2015, Washington Commerce Director Brian Bonlender signed a Memorandum of Understanding with the Chairman of the Chinese Academy of Sciences Holdings, pledging cooperation on opportunities to develop clean and low-carbon energy technologies. And Washington Governor Jay Inslee has said, “I’m very happy that the port and NW Innovation Works have reached this milestone.”
The Governor frames the development as part of a transition to a clean energy economy.
Other elected officials have also expressed interest in the projects for the sake of lowering carbon emissions relative to current oil and coal methanol production. Other local leaders, including Cowlitz Economic Development President Ted Sprague, Port of Kalama Commission President Alan Basso, Director of Economic Development for Pierce County Denise Dyer, and Port Commissioners from Kalama, Tacoma, and St. Helens, to name a few, have said they are excited at the job prospects associated with these methanol projects. In Tacoma, for example, many of these individuals voiced their support during a May 1, 2014 public comment period at a Port of Tacoma Port Commission meeting.
“Methanol is little understood by most of the public and its production raises some risks and concerns.”
At the same meeting, however, many Tacoma residents expressed a range of concerns including the potential for catastrophes, the proximity of the methanol site to homes, carbon and other chemical emissions, implicit support for fracking to extract natural gas, and a “lack of notice and dearth of information.” At a separate event at Port Westward on September 24, 2014, when a representative of Northwest Innovation Works failed to show up to present updates on the proposed project, many community members voiced similar concerns to those of Tacoma’s residents.
So far, the primary dissent from advocacy groups has come from Columbia Riverkeeper and the Northwest Environmental Defense Center. In December 2014, these NGOs submitted 319 pages of comments to the FERC and the state EIS scoping processes at Kalama, urging “the Port to prepare an EIS that fully and accurately discloses the wide reaching impacts of the proposed methanol export facility.” They also distributed published a list of five landscape-changing impacts associated with the construction of Northwest Innovation Works’ methanol plant at Kalama.
Update: September 25, 2015: After this article was published, the Seattle Times’ Hal Bernton reported that the Tacoma methanol refinery proposal will double in size.
BRIAN KEYES
NOT A GOOD THING, for multiple reasons!!!
David Moore
We are short of water and electricity and this will increase with climate change. Do not let these plants go through without major public inpt especially on fisheries and power supply
Jan Steinman
Not mentioned is that methanol is the primary reagent used to turn vegetable oil into biodiesel — it is typically 90% of the cost of biodiesel made from waste vegetable oil.
While it is true that methanol can be used as a precursor to making other petrochemicals, it is still more expensive to do so than to “crack” light petroleum products — so-called “liquid condensates” and the light oil from shale fracking are two precursor feedstocks that are much cheaper than methanol.
However, these lighter raw materials that are becoming a larger proportion of our crude flow are unsuitable for making diesel and jet fuel.
Could the hidden subtext here be a “gas to liquid” strategy to power diesels as heavy crude oil becomes more dear? My bet is that is what the Chinese are after.
richard pauli
This is astoundingly dumb.
With one headline, Gov Inslee goes from the most admired champion of global warming challenges, to the last place beaten carbon-palooka —
Washington State has some of its largest fires in recent history, happening just as voters begin to put together the concepts of fires, heatwaves and drought with global warming caused by carbon combustion. Gov Inslee used to know this science.
We should leave all carbon in the ground, but before that we should stop exporting carbon fuel to other nations… China just burns it and puts emissions in the atmosphere for the world to breath in. (or they make explosive chemicals and blow them up as toxic smoke)
Has Gov Inslee forgotten we live on a globe? With this action, he has lost my vote. Headline should read: Another Champion Takes a Dive.
Seth Armstrong
Thanks.
richard pauli
Jobs?
“U.S. Troops Deployed to Fight Wildfires in Drought-Stricken Western United States” http://climateandsecurity.org/2015/08/18/u-s-troops-deployed-to-fight-wildfires-in-drought-stricken-western-united-states/
(Oh I understand now, ship methanol, make warming worse, causing more fires, makes for more job openings for fighting fires)
Brian Sharp
What about the plastics? They are almost indestructible. Where do they end up? In the Pacific Ocean, the “graveyard” for plastics?
The lower Columbia is also too valuable to industrialize–not a good place. Dredging for example will negatively impact the already endangered salmon and steelhead runs in the Columbia basin.
And–the lower Columbia was the stronghold of the Pacific Northwest population of the California Condor. This population went extinct in the 1900s, but there are successful efforts to breed the survivors in captivity. If condors are to be reintroduced to the Pacific Northwest, the lower Columbia is the best place in the Pacific Northwest to do it. That is, if the river is not taken over by industry. Recently, there have been a number of environmentally destructive proposals from the fossil fuel industry in addition to this one (the manufacture and export of methanol), which will only destroy and pollute the Columbia Basin, the 2nd largest river in North America, second only to the Mississippi-Missouri. No one will represent the future habitat needs of the condors.
Russtnails
Waste pipe in your house so you don’t have to smell your own stink!!!!
richard pauli
Thank you Eric for your article, this issue needs more attention – I had to write the Governor:
Dear Governor Inslee,
I urge you to decline to join in China’s game of ‘extortion by coal emissions’ played out against the US. It appears to me that their negotiation tactic has been a type of international carbon blackmail resulting in an approval for refining and shipping methanol through our state.
Perhaps we can see this childish drama as a self-destructive threat. China is holding a gun to its head saying “you must deliver methanol to us or we’ll shoot ourselves with coal and then choke the world with our dirty coal emissions!”. But we know that the methanol converts to heavy CO2 emissions and other pollutants anyway. So China’s conniption amounts to throwing the extra black soot into the air. In reaction we must expect China to continue their laudable efforts at converting coal to clean energy systems. Surely, China will continue the progress it enjoys from deploying clean energy.
As you know, it is preferable for all carbon fuels to be left in the ground. Carbon ethics dictate that governments should avoid permitting carbon fuel pass-through operations. It both returns a very small percentage of the total revenue, and it triggers harmful long-term consequences. The few shipping jobs created are more than offset by global warming caused by those carbon emissions. More heating further shocks our state with heatwaves and bigger wildfires. And firefighters are not the kind of jobs you want to create.
I know you prefer to see energy generated within our state – as electricity from wind, solar, tidal and geo-thermal – all originate in Washington State and all optimal for continental export.
Voters are starting to understand the link between global warming and calamities of fire, drought and weather anomalies. Your leadership on environmental issues is locally appreciated and nationally noticed. And your deep understanding of climate science serves as a template for all politicians. As the world stands firm to face a destabilizing and heating world, these qualities make for you a robust suit of armor for an important political future.
You are our Climate Champion and we need you to make the right decision about the future. We trust that you will choose to reject this operation as damaging in so many ways.
Thanks for all that you do,
Steven Miller
What about the wastewater: what is in it and where will it go? Back into the Columbia River and then into the ocean? Dilution is not a solution.
Logan
does anybody else see how wrong it is to be exporting our natural resources not to mention being left with piles of waste what is wrong with this countryand using such tremendous amounts of water when water is going to be the next oil and be in short supply
Philip G Dooley Jr
2500 gallons of water a minute…, and we’re already being asked to conserve water. Perhaps China should be building desalination plants.
Allison Williams
Perhaps the US Western states should be building more desalination plants.
http://www.mercurynews.com/science/ci_25859513/nations-largest-ocean-desalination-plant-goes-up-near
Russtnails
Along with methanol plants. I like that!
Bea Christophersen
I’ve heard that IF the plant in Tacoma’s port was built, there is a very small chance that if something went wrong (3 Mile Island) and the gas/liquid was to ignite, the explosion would kill everyone in the city with the toxic air. ANY chance of this devastation is unacceptable. That is why these plants are usually built in areas far from populated areas just in case. The Port of Tacoma is no place for this plant. Owned by the Chinese? Do they care about our environment when they don’t care about their own? What a perfect place for sabotage by terrorist! This is no place to process these dangerous products.
David Moore
Metals pollution, huge water use during droughts and electrical power demands increased as well as pipeline accident potential. Clean energy economy? Sounds like we are becoming a natural resource colony for Chinese manufacturing to continue to appropriate the world’s jobs at devalued currency rates.
Aleks
My question is why does the hyperlink “a 2011 study from Duke University” take me to the profile of a professor at Stanford? Why is no one giving of the name of the study?
Ralph Marx
I had the same thought…… I would like to know approximately what the rate of degradation is for methanol. I suspect that it is quite rapid, not milliseconds but, certainly, not that long. Unbelievable all the hubris that is being thrown around in Tacoma who read Wikipedia and think they know what they are talking about. Methanol is one of the more innocuous chemicals to have around and serves as a building block for a number of downstream products. Few people seem to realise that so much of their lives involve plastics from the fleece jacket they wear to the kajak they paddle around with. Plastics are used for more than just Happy Meal toys. Go look at your plastic car bumper and then think back when it used to be a chromed hunk of metal…..
George
Let me get this straight.
The governor is proposing a carbon tax in Washington to reduce carbon, and at the same time wanting to build a plant that increase our foot print in a place that was part of a super fund clean up site?
Sounds like we’re heading the wrong way.
Victoria Hankwitz
CATASTROPHIC EARTHQUAKE ZONE IS SCIENTIFICALLY PIN POINTED RIGHT HERE IN TACOMA AND PUGET SOUND! The earthquake is a ticking time bomb. We know for certain that it will happen, we just don’t know the actual date. The earthquake will be so Catastrophically disastrous that FEMA and the Military will not be able to fly drinking water drops to the area, because of weight and demands for other emergency needs. So, our present water supply needs to be protected. We won’t have freeways to mobilize and move emergency relief personnel and needed supplies to the remaining suffering population. In-conclusion, damage to this proposed methanol plant won’t be attended to. Survivors will be on their own and it is in-human to think that a surviving, yet suffering, population could be eradicated due to the explosive, fire burning, hazardous wastes of this METHANOL PLANT. Survivors will resort to barbaric means to survive.. So, why would we add a dangerous methanol plant to the mix???? The magnitude of this catastrophic earthquake is known. Contamination and other lethal hazards need to be taken off the table as an economic benefit for the few, especially those who do not live here, but will make money off of our backs..
Victoria
Mark
Most people in Tacoma don’t know there is a fuel refining plant down the street. Any disaster there would burn Browns Point and Fife, then move to Tacoma if the wind blows that way. But safety is paramount, and a methanol plant would haven’t been noticed if the news or social media didn’t blow this out of proportion.
Danaher M Dempsey, Jr.
I hear a lot of concern about global warming and especially coal fired electricity production. It seems that a large increase in electricity production from non-fossil fuels is needed. What are the true non-subsidized costs of each of the following at this time? #1 Solar #2 Wind #3 Nuclear. Please keep in mind locations and the fact the Yucca Mountain waste repository in Nevada currently exists.
Tony
howdy, Eric
Let me get this straight.
The governor is proposing a carbon tax in Washington to reduce carbon, and at the same time wanting to build a plant that increase our foot print in a place that was part of a super fund clean up site?
Sounds like we’re heading the wrong way.
Tony
Robert Dier
Arent we supposed to be getting rid of Plastics instead of making more of it?
More business for China @ the risk of our Quality of Life.
NO!!! A THOUSAND TIMES NO!!!